RE: PLT's intent to support SRFI's?

["Will Fitzgerald" <fitzgerald@inetmi.com>]

Matthias & PLTers,

Could you introduce a standard process so that SRFIs could be easily
included by others who might have the time? Perhaps standardizing on a srfi
folder in the collects directory, or a REQUIRE-SRFI procedure? Perhaps
setting up a template for units/signatures so that PLT SRFIs get built in
the same way?

Will Fitzgerald


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu
> [mailto:owner-plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu]On Behalf Of Matthias
> Felleisen
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 3:24 PM
> To: schlie@mediaone.net
> Cc: plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu
> Subject: Re: PLT's intent to support SRFI's?
>
>
>
> SRFI will be adopted if we find them useful and when we find time.  I
> suspect that all "library" style SRFIs will find their way into PLT Scheme
> some time after the conversion to v200 has been completed. For others, I
> would not assume anything.
>
> -- Matthias
>
>