[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PLT's intent to support SRFI's?

To: schlie@mediaone.net
Subject: Re: PLT's intent to support SRFI's?
From: Matthias Felleisen <matthias@cs.rice.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:24:03 -0600 (CST)
CC: plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu
In-reply-to: <B6DE4E1B.52C3%schlie@mediaone.net> (message from Paul Schlie onWed, 21 Mar 2001 12:25:00 -0500)
References: <B6DE4E1B.52C3%schlie@mediaone.net>
Reply-to: matthias@rice.edu
Sender: owner-plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu


SRFI will be adopted if we find them useful and when we find time.  I
suspect that all "library" style SRFIs will find their way into PLT Scheme
some time after the conversion to v200 has been completed. For others, I 
would not assume anything. 

-- Matthias

Follow-Ups:
- RE: PLT's intent to support SRFI's?
  - From: "Will Fitzgerald" <fitzgerald@inetmi.com>

References:
- PLT's intent to support SRFI's?
  - From: Paul Schlie <schlie@mediaone.net>

Prev by Date: PLT's intent to support SRFI's?
Next by Date: RE: MysterX preliminary port to v200
Prev by thread: PLT's intent to support SRFI's?
Next by thread: RE: PLT's intent to support SRFI's?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread