[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: define-syntax and Clinger's implementation

To: "Ji-Yong D. Chung" <virtualcyber@erols.com>
Subject: Re: define-syntax and Clinger's implementation
From: Matthew Flatt <mflatt@cs.utah.edu>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 05:16:29 -0800
CC: <plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu>
In-Reply-To: <001601c077cd$ce74dc60$0100007f@cradle>
References: <EDFD2A95EE7DD31187350090279C676701493BE8@THRESHER><p0433010bb6793cf11a98@[128.42.2.124]><024701c076d9$08b563e0$0100007f@cradle> <200101050535.AAA14154@bosch.cs.brown.edu> <001601c077cd$ce74dc60$0100007f@cradle>
Sender: owner-plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu

Quoting "Ji-Yong D. Chung":
>     I just modified define-syntax package that comes 
> with Bigloo and loaded it into MzScheme.  For the simple
> test cases in R5RS, the package produces
> correct, hygienic result.

It won't work for the non-R5RS constructs in MzScheme, though.

We have already implemented `define-syntax' with `syntax-rules',
`syntax-case', and more for next release. See
  http://www.cs.utah.edu/~mflatt/tmp/modules.txt
for details.

Matthew

References:
- Question on Multithreading from C API
  - From: Brent Fulgham <brent.fulgham@xpsystems.com>
- Re: Question on Multithreading from C API
  - From: Robert Bruce Findler <robby@cs.rice.edu>
- bug in define-syntax
  - From: "Ji-Yong D. Chung" <virtualcyber@erols.com>
- bug in define-syntax
  - From: Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk@cs.brown.edu>
- define-syntax and Clinger's implementation
  - From: "Ji-Yong D. Chung" <virtualcyber@erols.com>

Prev by Date: define-syntax and Clinger's implementation
Next by Date: Re: define-syntax and Clinger's implementation
Prev by thread: define-syntax and Clinger's implementation
Next by thread: Re: define-syntax and Clinger's implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread