[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug in define-syntax

To: "Ji-Yong D. Chung" <virtualcyber@erols.com>
Subject: bug in define-syntax
From: Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk@cs.brown.edu>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 00:35:14 -0500 (EST)
Cc: <plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu>
In-Reply-To: <024701c076d9$08b563e0$0100007f@cradle>
References: <EDFD2A95EE7DD31187350090279C676701493BE8@THRESHER><p0433010bb6793cf11a98@[128.42.2.124]><024701c076d9$08b563e0$0100007f@cradle>
Sender: owner-plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu

Ji-Yong D. Chung wrote:

>	       I was looking at 
> synruler.ss, and it seems that the
> pattern matching is not using lexical
> information (that is, no binding information
> is used).

That is correct.

Shriram

Follow-Ups:
- define-syntax and Clinger's implementation
  - From: "Ji-Yong D. Chung" <virtualcyber@erols.com>

References:
- Question on Multithreading from C API
  - From: Brent Fulgham <brent.fulgham@xpsystems.com>
- Re: Question on Multithreading from C API
  - From: Robert Bruce Findler <robby@cs.rice.edu>
- bug in define-syntax
  - From: "Ji-Yong D. Chung" <virtualcyber@erols.com>

Prev by Date: bug in define-syntax
Next by Date: scheme_make_class_assembly
Prev by thread: bug in define-syntax
Next by thread: define-syntax and Clinger's implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread