Re: module questions

[Eli Barzilay <eli@barzilay.org>]

On Dec 28, Michael Vanier wrote:
> 
> [...]  I just want to split the functions into different files for
> conceptual clarity. [...]  Also, it occurred to me after posting
> that a much simpler way to achieve my goals is simply to use "load"
> to bring together files with mutual dependencies into a third file,
> which could itself be a module.

But this is not free enough -- if you use `include' you get everything
you want like:

--- x.ss -------
(module foo mzscheme
  (require (lib "include.ss"))
  (include "a.ss")
  (define b 2)
  (provide b))
--- a.ss -------
(define a 1)
(provide a)
----------------

BTW, is it a known issue that when requiring a library encounters an
error then you're left with some intermediate state where some of the
bindings are visible (and mutable) and some not?

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                  http://www.barzilay.org/                 Maze is Life!