[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

using 199.X (was Re: newline comparison?)

To: plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu
Subject: using 199.X (was Re: newline comparison?)
From: Matthew Flatt <mflatt@cs.utah.edu>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 19:55:22 -0600 (MDT)
In-Reply-To: <j6vghoqnkx.fsf@explicit.atdesk.com>
References: <j6elocy02n.fsf@explicit.atdesk.com><200110092143.PAA15967@fast.cs.utah.edu> <j6vghoqnkx.fsf@explicit.atdesk.com>
Sender: owner-plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu

Quoting Chris Uzdavinis:
> Is 199.X stable?

Yes.

DrScheme is missing features that are important for teaching, and there
are still many rough edges. But most users who are willing to download
via CVS and compile the source should switch to 199.X. See

     http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/anoncvs/

for instructions.

Matthew

References:
- newline comparison?
  - From: Chris Uzdavinis <chris@atdesk.com>
- Re: newline comparison?
  - From: Matthew Flatt <mflatt@cs.utah.edu>
- Re: newline comparison?
  - From: Chris Uzdavinis <chris@atdesk.com>

Prev by Date: Re: newline comparison?
Next by Date: Re: Problem building a statically linked Mzscheme
Prev by thread: Re: newline comparison?
Next by thread: Re: newline comparison?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread