RE: Scheme_Manager_Reference and friends

[Alexey Mahotkin <alexm@jet.msk.su>]

>>>>> "PAS" == Paul A Steckler <psteckler@earthlink.net> writes:

    >> one of our extensions uses scheme_add_managed(),
    >> Scheme_Manager_Reference, etc.  However, in newer MzScheme
    >> those things simply disappeared.  Aren't they not needed no
    >> more, or what should we replace those with?

    PAS> I believe items with Manager in their name now have Custodian
    PAS> in their name.

Thanks!

Matthew, it seems like the following should be mentioned in
MzScheme_200.txt:


Index: MzScheme_200.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/scheme/Archives/AnonCVS/plt/notes/mzscheme/MzScheme_200.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -u -r1.14 MzScheme_200.txt
--- MzScheme_200.txt	2001/06/19 02:08:33	1.14
+++ MzScheme_200.txt	2001/06/25 12:06:20
@@ -131,6 +131,13 @@
    either replaced by `unit/sig' names or eliminated in favor of
    existing `unit/sig' names.
 
+
+Warning to MzScheme extensions writers:
+
+ * Scheme_Manager_Reference from `scheme.h' is now called
+   Scheme_Custodian_Reference.  Same for other symbols with `Manager'.
+
+
 MzLib changes:
 
  * "functio.ss" was split into "list.ss" and "etc.ss"


--alexm