[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

MzScheme and SML

To: <plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu>
Subject: MzScheme and SML
From: "Ji-Yong D. Chung" <virtualcyber@erols.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:11:32 -0500
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102160401001.28449-100000@info.numeric-quest.com> <006401c09856$aeb76d80$5d0c1cac@redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Sender: owner-plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu

    Having read several messages in this
maling list about SML, I was wondering
if anyone had a chance to compare MzScheme with 
SML/NJ.  What woiuld be the relative strong and 
weak points of one system versus the other?

    Is SML/NJ just a faster Scheme system
with different syntax and compile-time type checking?

    I would be grateful for any comments.

Follow-Ups:
- MzScheme and SML
  - From: Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk@cs.brown.edu>

References:
- Re: Just for your fun and horror
  - From: Jan Skibinski <jans@numeric-quest.com>
- Re: Just for your fun and horror
  - From: "Erik Meijer" <erik@meijcrosoft.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Just for your fun and horror
Next by Date: MzScheme and SML
Prev by thread: Re: Just for your fun and horror
Next by thread: MzScheme and SML
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread