Re: plan for moving to modules

[Matthew Flatt <mflatt@cs.utah.edu>]

Quoting Matthew Flatt:
> On the assumption that `module' is a plausible direction for us, [...]

This message probably didn't make much sense, because it's a proposal
within another proposal, and it was meant to go to individuals (for
now) working on the problem instead of plt-scheme.

When a few layers of proposals have been resolved, I'll explain again.
Meanwhile, sorry for the junk mail.

Matthew