[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Scheme acceptance [no flames]

To: "John R. Hall" <overcode@lokigames.com>
Subject: Re: Scheme acceptance [no flames]
From: Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk@cs.brown.edu>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 14:39:26 -0500 (EST)
Cc: plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu
In-Reply-To: <3A085A13.ED44430C@lokigames.com>
References: <EDFD2A95EE7DD31187350090279C676701178F66@THRESHER><3A08508D.3C1852D7@lokigames.com><200011071906.OAA25875@bosch.cs.brown.edu><3A085A13.ED44430C@lokigames.com>
Sender: owner-plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu

John R. Hall wrote:

> Good decision, but shouldn't the title reflect that? Scheme started
> making more sense once I realized that I was not programming in Scheme,
> but rather MzScheme. 

Good point.  The title probably will.

> Sure. Slackware packages are extremely easy to put together. I'll try to
> package the current version, and if there are no problems I wouldn't
> mind maintaining it.

Excellent!  Keep us posted.

Shriram

References:
- RE: Scheme acceptance [no flames]
  - From: Brent Fulgham <brent.fulgham@xpsystems.com>
- Re: Scheme acceptance [no flames]
  - From: "John R. Hall" <overcode@lokigames.com>
- Re: Scheme acceptance [no flames]
  - From: Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk@cs.brown.edu>
- Re: Scheme acceptance [no flames]
  - From: "John R. Hall" <overcode@lokigames.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Scheme acceptance [no flames]
Next by Date: Re: PLT Scheme development directions
Prev by thread: Re: Scheme acceptance [no flames]
Next by thread: Re: Scheme acceptance [no flames]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread