[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compund units in extensions
On Sat, 26 Feb 2000, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> For `exports', scheme_assemble_compound_unit() actually expects a list
> where every individual exported variable is represented by a separate
> item. More specifically, the exports argument should be
>
> A list of export specifications, where each export specification is a
> pair consisting of
> * a tag symbol
> * a symbol naming one export from the corresponding sub-unit
> (used as both the name of the sub-unit export and the name
> of the compound unit's export), or a pair of symbols where the
> first one is the name of the sub-unit's export and the second
> one is the name as exported from the compound unit
>
Yep, that did the trick. Thanks for the help, now maybe I can get 0.0.1 of
my extension out.
Thanks
RJA